That is, the seventies. They're back? Are they coming back? Are preparing to return to pollute our innocent sleep of nightmares? The alarm is tripped, the peaceful world trembles, s'inquieta, gets angry: according to the sensitivity of its components. That are different, especially for economic diversification and, consequently, social, and in many cases also political.
In short, the scuffles, fights, incidents of violence and some scratches at the capital's monuments, ornaments, fashion shows during the original Tuesday, December 14, led the ringing of this alarm. Always on top zeal for information, public and private broadcasters are continuing to hammer those events along the twenty-four hours of the day and every single day residue of the month and down with those expected later in the new year. As for the dominant tone of the comments, there is little to distinguish and point out: make a unanimous chorus of condemnation of the "thugs", variously dosed only pimento moralizing. That is to say, all the specificity of our political landscape shoot the sentence, but some positions are distinguished by an excess of fury that rhyme with envy precise: it is not surprising that the mouths intent to rinse the gums are almost all around the master of violence varied , though not loud: the text-winner of the battle buyer parliamentary vote of no confidence by some thought merry unaware of the resources of Cayman. Gliding toward the center and moving a little more 'tones are far less screaming, but the solemn conviction does not suffer from anemia. All wearing the black bloc , subversive of the established order. And all shades just as sensitive in solidarity with the play "police". Which, in the opinion of too many samples of moderately inclined to idolatry of the Order with a capital letter, are always right, whatever they do. Even the dirtiest. As it happens, almost inevitably, every time you meet with the protesters a bit 'too upset. Donde Minutes of the outcry brought too many authorities and individuals all'autoassoluzione forgetful and carefree oblivion of their past and possible mitigating explosive anger. From the former mayor (s) to the League capital of the former fascist revolutionary splinter group that occupies the interior ministry, by too many parrots arcoriani (Cicchitto Bondi Bonaiuti Capezzone Wolves and other big-heads) to the Minister of Justice space, it was all stirred up a chorus of alarms complaints to the magistrates who set free the arrested youth did not emerge against which no misconduct due to immediate custody. With a peak of chance that tilts to the ridiculous: sending inspectors in legal defense the capital of the astral by Alfano. Few, and only on the left, while condemning the revelry Scassa-windows-and-burn machines, data are thought to understand the pressures of some angry youth against this state does not own father. Sensitivity is lacking in too many politicians (professional or abusive), and journalists in the pay of top moderatume not honored. At which there is broad complaint, documented, honest to a collision course with the pestiferous conformism free-capitalist, whose crimes are never recognized and branded for what they are. Why, string string, this is the Busillis : as free trade, a lot of financial freedom, seasoned perfectly free relocation globalist (bastard creature but undeniable genetically wild capitalism), and led a largely disastrous for much of the social strata exposed workers and youth in the head.
When young people are denied the future, when they are forced to stasis inert gravitating family on modest income (from salary or pension avarissima, often grandparents), they think, the right-minded cauliflower, that it is necessary and can remain happy and quiet until the unlikely age? Yet this is the implication of what they think the champions of liberalism dogmatic, unyielding evidence of the deeds and misdeeds of that I believe apply to the management of the democratic state. A ' authoritative figure of this sample, Piero Ottone, corseresco editorial on Saturday 18th (title, rights and the law , dominated by this eye of a handsome red-alert, "Violence is never justifiable" ) provides yet another summary of his thoughts crystallized surrogate, flaunting formulas and seductive abstractions optative the cruising merrily over the brutalities of material events. Let us follow him as a penitential pilgrimage. It begins with a stop right drive shaped like a block of marble: "There's part of some media - newspapers and TV broadcasts - some irresponsible indulgence, as a sort justificationism of ideological and moral, against those responsible for the riots in Rome, that evil can be reconciled with the idea of \u200b\u200bliberal democracy. " So much heartbreak capital of Liberty (but in which the media has read and heard?) Rests, in the second Ostellino This "basic thesis, that" the political class, in fact, it would be nestled inside the palace, to secure a 'red zone' and could not look, in addition to what was happening in the streets, even the majority of Italians who do not show, but who are equally depressed and despondent. "This" flatbread "and abusive drug addict is merely" a updated version of the 'comrades who make mistakes' (but they are right). And this triggered the rush of indignant priest of Liberty offense: "To say the words to justify the criminal violence that has put fire to the capital are wrong is an understatement." Again, but where's the peck? And you have to add to that "little"? Presto said, those words are "dangerous." And it said, states Don Piero, without any indulgence to " this political class" which "we can say all the bad possible" as he does himself in person (to put it Catarella Camilleri) " in each his article. " But any such penalty does not justify the accusation that poor patchwork "of being unable to understand the reasons for the violence are those of the majority of Italians (which are not so expensive cars to burn): such an accusation is tantamount to" refuse policy itself. " Which policy (dutifully capped capitalized) "remains the only means of peaceful settlement of differences and conflicts." A solid barrier, beyond which you can do more than "throw open the doors to terrorism." How can we not understand that the "red zone" did not intend to "defend the class policy, but the institutions "to defend those" criminals or idiots convinced to make the revolution breaking shop windows and cash machines. " Not only that, but according to the columnist (who improvised guess here) idiots fracassone were also "willing to Parliament to extend the same treatment." More or less as it did with young people "who wanted to peacefully demonstrate their opposition and were themselves overwhelmed by violence." Now all that remains is to go theorising. "Manifest is a liberal inalienable freedom, a constitutional right." So far, everything is smooth and clear skies. Which sky becomes cloudy, however, when it passes to the "different and more complex definition of" covering "the claim by every social group, of their corporate rights, whenever they are touched by politics, claiming that the Parliament back down with them to the choices made every rustle of the event, otherwise the 'separation' of the country by the country office and the real risk of violence. " And here we are out "of liberal democracy and representative", indeed rushed "into a surreal pluralism that ignores the rules of constitutionalism and ignores individual freedoms." Or, to put it in brighter colors (after an obvious objection ingenuous Rousseau): "You end up, in essence, the permanent assembly of Piazza, outcome in the denial of free lessons, that is in the emptying of popular sovereignty, totalitarianism in to a supposed 'general will' (which is, then, more detail). Unless you want to fall in representative democracy if the election is to win their party politics. "
And here's a small moan escapes: Homini Sumus, not the . Of course, "when you resort to violence, no more talk of rights. It calls into question the law. That must be respected. It 's a fact that the' continuous rivendicazionismo rights (or privileges?) collective and corporate is a symptom of a crisis of representative democracy. " At the end of the outburst, a little lesson-a warning about this democracy, which - writing, teaching - "you should discuss with propriety of language cultural and political concessions without demagogic and totalitarian, and avoiding upsetting, as it is done, the very foundations. "
Some postscript to such a doctrine as a duty we try unavoidable. If russoviana "general will" always boils down to particular, why the same logical process-slimming does not happen to his "popular will"? Because, perhaps, is guaranteed "free vote"? Well. Let's look at this master-key of the Liberal Democrats. So free voting and belongs in great part to the prevailing social strata with less education, policy evaluation capacity of people and events, widely available to the market (the same one that won the majority in skimpy premier, but larger and easier for the Buyer). During the local elections in the Sicilian city of Liotrivi that this market provides different amounts for each social level of voter: the quoted figures which rose by 50 percent and to € 150. The elected mayor was the high expectations, personal physician of the Cayman, but who ended up tried and convicted of waste and abuse of all kinds. Hundreds of public administrators of this substance: free voting? Why not, but like "at what price." Which undermines the claim and implied purity of roots and humus in the vaunted liberal democracy. Compliance with the law? It can not be absolute, otherwise we should justify the Nazi Executioner call that respect. But it was a dictatorship, yes, but it brought to power by "free will" of voters. It may be objected to the unfair laws can be modified. Sure, but that vice of particularism that the liberal illusion to avoid. Maybe buggy moved into the sanctuary said Parliament. And when did the liberal democracies have ensured fairness to all classes and social strata? Read the "free parliament" voted in favor of privileged classes and cliques (Mammon teacher) should be respected by those submissions? To say, in a climate of theoretical abstractions, it does little, maybe you can recite in Latin, dura lex, sed lex , bear the practical effect is a little heavier. Gliding towards the ground, the situation today in Italy and a hundred other countries that is not surprising that they are much more severe riots broke out that these outbursts of temper and prejudices of a few showcase cash and luxury sedans. But really, the explanation of the mood of the privileged sermoneggianti is so obvious that humbles even spend for words. And it is so tough that they would not even accuse the scandal to the gentlemen of their benefits and privileges, often of a magnitude outrageously provocative. But yes, I think of superstipendi of managers and leaders of thousands and thousands of disparate agencies. And to squander public money (that is, money taken from our pockets and families) who angered investigators and patients with alacrity, as Aldo Rizzo and Gian Antonio Stella: last complaint, the lavish Molise. That is incredible for its size, shamelessness, inertia control structures. And what about all the scandals mazzettari levels that are emerging in a continuous jet? The historic tangentopoli was not killed by the Clean Hands, it was just squatting and forced to pause for a few upsurge equally virulent.
This is the reality of liberal democracy as the floral display abstract theorising. And everywhere, even if Italy will celebrate one of its many negative records. I like by the majority were not combated and prevented, but widely extolled. As demonstrated by the percentage of suspects and seized. And there is bad for people who are presented for election as gravediggers of the "old politics" and the new moralizing. Yes, the new Marple wad are affected by nostalgia for the "glorious" Tangentopoli. But it will never get a second Clean Hands dipietrizzata? On the other hand, you save on defenseless poor bastards, such as pensioners of the School. At that point a professor of philosophy and history, after forty years of honest service, he finds himself with a pension that does not arrive at the net, not even two thousand Euros per month (and dare with a tax levy of 26%). While the chattering of the sovereign Parliament lazy wallow in the bathroom of a thousand privileges, making faces at the usual contaballe that promise at every turn our season, cut the plethora of Parliament, savings on travel "illustrious" (Blue cars, flights and so on), use overcontrol broad gamut of public finances, so often "abused" in more and less. And all this would not be violence? Perhaps it would agree to pay more cautious attention to the strange and the Anonymous pamphlet wise Athenian of the fifth century BC C., democracy as violence (Sellerio that the title of the masterfully edited and annotated by Luciano Canfora). Certainly not to celebrate the dictatorship, but certainly not to sing praises of liberal-democratic unaware of vulnerable that make it imperfect operational reality.
*
Eureka! We won. I mean, he won the peace. So, consequently, we peaceful and pacifist. This scrittorello had concluded a few days ago, was stopped to wait for the new round of 22 last year: the Roman procession of students. Today we congratulate those guys for the self-restraint, and (in his own way) cheerful inventiveness that has suggested to avoid the "red zone" and the possible (indeed inevitable in the event of a challenge), however, clashes fanned. And I did it with humor and the funny smiling composure. One of their "signs" it said joke-truth: "You only in the red zone, we free the city." Here is how he presents an article Corsera : "Written in white on blue, the banner unfurled in front of the Sapienza announced early in the morning the prank organized by students. No attempt to force the blocks of the police [...] but a peaceful march, colorful and quirky invade the outskirts of Rome, blocking the highway and the highway for several hours for the eagle (a symbol, too) and in more than one ' at cashing in solidarity the people on the street. " The climax of the adventure, the joy of being received by President Napolitano, listened to live (one could say his father's) interest, invited to put in writing their objections to the reform Gelmini ("We must begin to build these corrections) and send: "Send me, will assess them." How naive appeal to the President addressed the rallies because refuses to sign the decrees, it was left to improvise your kind patience smiling a little lesson on atypical constitutional limits of his powers. And this man has done with the Hill including tolerance.
Faced to the success of the Roman Empire, the violence of Palermo and Milan fade as small splashes of rain in a mostly sunny sky. While considerations of money experts and journalists (such as, for example, Vico and Ferrera: Corsera , resources that are : "The day ended yesterday with a positive balance. The Revelation feared there was [...] the bold initiative of the Head of State did the rest ") on the need for resources to cultural institutions, beginning with the school in all its ramifications, and research, retain their value stimulus. A small red the attractive faces should not always be certain political enthusiasts preventive arrests and detentions are unjustified.
course, this moment, as I say, hopefully relax, stay well away from the correct translation of the expectations and legislative acts actually operating. We know only too well the cunning of political rulers, especially the uncertain fate of this splintered majority, to abandon hopes of strong euphoria and the eve of certainty. Luke's words Cafagna (the young man who challenged the Russian to "Annozero") are incisive: "Now the government opens up a confrontation with us, because you can not close always in the red areas in the buildings and armored vehicles. " But we can not give more than a wish felt (doubtful as to the other party).
Pasquale Liccardo
0 comments:
Post a Comment