Who has not had experience of the language fair? They tell you one thing and imply another, you sell an item praising the quality, and when you use it to find out the flaws. It so happens everywhere: in politics, economy, culture. It is not always easy to discover the deception. Difficulties increase with the increase of the importance of context, even become insurmountable for many (too many) minds on the subject of economics, politics, religion and related works. Where can I sell stuffing instead of bread, instead of being suffering, coercion and blackmail in a place of freedom, illusions and hopes instead of insane and thanks heavens. Of course, promoting those surrogates to talk to honest swindling contents of the promise: the height of deception.
For months, Sergio Marchionne threatens workers Fiom outcome of the referendum that will decide the fate of the agreements already signed by CISL and UIL: yes or wins or move abroad Fiat Mirafiori the planned investments. Here's a typical little phrase allusive, veiled but clear in this sense: "If the referendum win no, toast in Detroit." That is, in the above-expected (and eagerly) terminal of the long, repeated threat of "offshoring" in the great America, you know, the workers were "convinced" to accept the weight loss of their rights (otherwise perceived as fattening of fatigue). When the new secretary general of the CGIL, Susanna Camusso, accuses him of provocation and insults, not only to workers, but also to Italy, he replied that he just wants to take note of the change . Here is a master key word, a magical sound that conveys meaning malicious but well covered. Dire Change (uppercase and all of the substance) behind this trick: globalization is forcing companies to act in a radical change in working conditions: if you want to stand up to foreign competition, you be competitive to be, you have to produce at lower costs, to reduce costs, you have to reduce wages and workers' rights: fewer breaks and less time consuming, less comfortable to be absent, and if you get sick, that few hours away, or lose their jobs. And an "etc." is understood, the change . But here are the words that occurred in a duel to the distance between Fiat and Camusso. If a threat of one, the other responds that Mr. Fiat "insulting the country every day." Not only that, but "keeps hidden the business plan [...] with the complicity of a government that does not do his job, but is a fan and promoter of the fee reduction." Words of truth, those scales, ab angry , secretary CGIL. Words sacrosanct. But the target is lava rock, and without a trace of embarrassment, the reply (from his infamous Detroit): "If you insult means introducing a new model of working in Italy, I assume my responsibilities. But it is not. And you can not confuse this with an insult to Italy. "Just this parade soberly defensive? We are not naive: Marchionne needs paint arrogant, provocative of overdoing it. How? It 'easy to understand: inverting the "semantics" of the case, turning (its) guilt under the penance imposed (to others) with blackmail in promotional award. A bonanza for the workers and for the whole of Italy from the Alps to Capo Passero. Let's hear it: insult to Italy? "Indeed, we are trying our best to change it." Here it is still there the change, here's the absolutization sacred. Perhaps the worker does not include such finesse? Patience, he will learn over time: there is no education better than a whip in form need . And if the miracle epistemological (or Gnostic ?) Does not happen, never mind: there is perhaps need to explain to people the subtle nature of the Holy Spirit? The mental situation of the context "Fiat-workers-change" is of that type: a religious mantra, a grim absolute . Religion, Giordano Bruno taught well "for them rude people who Denno [should] be governed." They are not, perhaps, the people (the adjective should be set aside, out of delicacy hairy) workers? One might add that perhaps Marchionne implies, that this little thought: so much so that they peacefully accepted where there has been rabble-rousing, in that of CISL and UIL, the lands of common sense and realism. After all, Marchionne did not have - he says - "neither with nor with the Camusso Fiom, nor even with the CGIL and Landini. They have views that are completely different from ours and does not reflect what we see at international level. No one is telling them to change the point of view, but this does not allow them to accuse others. " Even the words of respect for the opponent "does not understand" the change, does not see the international situation, etc.: which task, respectful gentleman, this smiling manager of iron! So worthy of admiration that our national sackcloth sub specie hominis, as well as premier (the will of the most Bruno's italy people from too many lives) wasted no time in siding with Mr. Fiat. Here are the winged words uttered from the podium in Berlin, a "site" right allusion (the Merker has convinced his workers to tighten their belts and "modular" teeth and saliva to grow Germana "solidarity"): "If he wins the no to the referendum, is just go away! But perhaps, given the verbal shots indirizzatigli him, tomorrow will say that it was misinterpreted and that he only intended to help the many who strive and convert those to curb rowdy Fiom. So he thought of those who follow him for three decades. And so it was (details aside).
In any case, we need the heel still seraphic Number One Fiat, that truce is not allowed to define his idea of \u200b\u200b(alleged) fair and responsible Italian. Those who were amazed that Marchionne has not yet honored ethics, be consoled: did it (one can not do everything in one fell swoop!). Here he describes as "immoral" waste (a certain waste), and always the stronghold of Detroit launches lightning Savonarola: "The era of waste is over. Losing time money and opportunity, squander resources, physical and intellectual is not only uneconomical and destructive: it is immoral. " At this point we can say that the portrait is complete: his quiet consciousness of managers fits perfectly with the cynicism that ignores the human reality (say, mental and physical) of individual workers. And anyone who crosses his path of General lucky, able to put on the wall (it was only of deprivation), the infantryman or corporal who deviates from its final path.
Marchionne, in fact, is immoral to defend the workers more dignified and moralissimi his compensation. Sunday, January 9 by Fabio Fazio, Nichi Vendola had a revelation instructive on the Fiat manager: Marchionne took almost five million euro per year (plus who knows how many and which bonus: the stuff that the British government is allowing banks to pay their most successful manager in business), and explain that these fees this moralist kappa is taking more than 450 times the salary of a worker Fiat. It pointed out, the Communist governor of Puglia, the historic leader of the Fiat, Valletta, took just twenty times that wage. Here is an edifying example of morality Marchionneschi. Yet Vendola wrong default: to Annozero (January 13) we learned that, between salary, bonuses, stock options and other gadgets do not know what liberal, his annual compensation exceeds twenty million, and amounted to 1070 times the salary of a worker. How to judge so shamelessly? Cynicism? Naive? Liberal Consistency? A reporter from the infamous Journal Arcor has no doubt that there is to criticize? If they deserve all their euro. He saved the Fiat at a difficult time: we should be grateful, and that's it. And 'logic, to date, the old mammon. The same banks that inspires, and our planet.
course, this change is not presented in its naked and obscene partisan and oppressive reality is disguised by lies trivial and even opposite meanings, but yes, indeed, in our case, as a wage increase. He does not talk, Marchionne, an annual increase of € 1743? Here is one of the many tricks: that increase is more than offset by growth in fact working hours, breaks accordingly reduced and the ruthlessness of the rounds.
But the most deadly deception is the presentation of the infamous change as a fatal event, that is divine and almost inevitable. That is to say, no human event and problematic, but absolute necessity, inexorable evolution of events that move the story, with or without the consent of the agents humans. In short, it would be fatalities, para-divine, similar to the mysterious intentions dell'Ananke greek, or the terrible Jehovah of the Bible, destroyer of cities and first-born. The reality, though, is different, or at least presentable otherwise. With little, indeed no man-advantage of the actors. This change is simply undeniable that the widening practice of laissez-faire: that creature is not human, theorized by economists and philosophers of great prestige, and practiced more widely in the world infected by "Western civilization." Pace of continued denial of his alleged excellence, for the side effects of its consistent application. The practice of free markets is certainly favored by the specific economic and financial success: see the recent fortunes of China, India, Brazil and, in small, emerging from other countries. All right, then? Not at all. When you highlight those successes, it is silent, usually, the price paid by the majority, how many will be in China, the new rich? One hundred million? The well-off, two hundred? And those who have improved, albeit slightly, their conditions? Two hundred? I think figures are exaggerated, but even if they were realistic, would still be a minority. You say, well-being will be sacrificed even for today. But the experience sounds: bell horse. Liberalism is a good aggressive patrols and unscrupulous which does not even use the words of the workers, poor, unemployed, enslaved, not seen, and so on. This rosary is ignored by the various Marchionne on the planet. The language which knows only the words business, company, profit, productivity, competition, growth, GDP, and so inebriating on the same meter. The apparent innocence of these words is the perfidy of the wolf in sheep's clothing: its use hides the dramatic reality of workers' subordination to the logic dell'aziendalismo ice in the global race. This so-called Western civilization, liberal-democratic and Christian is best described as hypocritical Mammonites: fine words and questionable facts, and most infamous. Even self-defeating: the rampant capitalism is to suffocate the planet in all its ecosystems from land to sea, from rivers to the mountains, from lakes to forests. And the roads, motoring colonized by wild, have become the nightmare of elderly people forced to drive. This proud civilization would be better defined apotheosis of hi-tech waste of Babylon rubbish killer. Disasters point each year (some in full and tragic course these days) are timely and the price of this foolish mentality tragic bulimic. But in vain they show us that we are marching towards inevitable self-destruction: who listens to these voices of deeds and misdeeds correctly interpreted by a few careful observers? What matters is the economic success, the ever-growing monetization of social life. With the spreading of vicious mob led stragista of drug trafficking and shopping malls teeming with money to clean up blood. And 'the paradox of humanity: so much intelligence, so much talent, technology more "fine" and miraculous, and the triumph of stupidity and murderous, unseen, suicidal. Beyond the occasional scoop of pandemics we're cultivating a radical slow but definitive.
*
Returning to the subject restricted. We are the days of the results of the referendum Fiat. Habemus papam : the yes won, comments staple each camp interprets the results as its own victory, despite what a tight 54% (guaranteed only by the vote-collar). But will not the time for comments for now we must end this mini- cahier des doléances . Maybe if that were to be avoided (perhaps) the classic worst. The future will tell us the extent to which the oppressed to resist oppression and to the lies of the bosses, and to what else they want to push them or mitigate them. The speeches of Camusso Landini and were not made at the discretion of, but still pique on the defense of dignity working: we respect the outcome of the referendum, but do not sign the agreements at issue. And we propose to open a new negotiation table for a clear threat to the protection of that dignity.
Meanwhile you should question those who wonder of dismal five-pointed stars (the emblem of the Red Brigades) appeared to skirt the threats to the heroic Marchionne. It says do not be afraid. And maybe it's true. At least a bit ': it is so convinced of marching on the path of pure virtue to feel protected by some divine celestial guardian of all virtues. His is, in fact, the only one who knows her type of man, under the lame (but shiny drunk of faith in society worldly ) of managerial success, whatever the cost (to others). And then you feel virtuous in full swing.
But do not close with that grim warning, we report a thought of the great John Maynard Keynes, proof that the letters are not all in the distinction of economic and social theories. And you can be liberal in many ways (not only to Panebianco, Ostellino clerics and the like). Here it is: "The transition from anarchy to a regime that deliberately seeks to control and direction of economic forces in the interest of justice and social stability will present enormous difficulties, both technical and political. However, I believe that the true destiny of the new liberalism consists in answering them groped, "accepting" the risk of ridicule and dell'impopolarità "
Pasquale Liccardo
0 comments:
Post a Comment